首页> 外文OA文献 >Reducing incision length or intensifying rehabilitation: what makes the difference to length of stay in total hip replacement in a UK setting?
【2h】

Reducing incision length or intensifying rehabilitation: what makes the difference to length of stay in total hip replacement in a UK setting?

机译:减少切口长度或加强康复:在英国,全髋关节置换的住院时间长短有何不同?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Minimal-incision surgery for hip arthroplasty and intensive post-op physiotherapy have both been shown to allow early mobilisation and to reduce hospital stay. Forty-five patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty using a standard posterior approach were compared with 51 patients using a minimal incision. In both groups, physiotherapy involved either a routine or intensive regime. Patients were matched in age, sex and body mass index. There was no significant difference in blood loss, post-operative stay and change in Oxford hip scores at one year between the mini- and standard-incision groups. There was a significant difference (P=0.003) in length of stay between routine- and intensive-physiotherapy groups (11.4 vs. 7.9 days). The dislocation rate was higher in the mini-incision group. This study suggests that in a standard UK setting, intensive physiotherapy can significantly decrease in-patient stay, but reducing the incision length does not.
机译:髋关节置换术的小切口手术和术后强化物理治疗均已证明可以早期动员并减少住院时间。将采用标准后路入路进行全髋关节置换术的45例患者与采用最小切口的51例患者进行比较。在两组中,物理治疗均涉及常规或强化治疗。患者的年龄,性别和体重指数均匹配。迷你切口组和标准切口组之间的失血量,术后住院时间和牛津髋关节评分变化在一年内没有显着差异。常规和强化物理治疗组之间的住院时间有显着差异(P = 0.003)(11.4 vs. 7.9天)。小切口组的脱位率较高。这项研究表明,在标准的英国环境中,强化物理治疗可以显着减少住院时间,但减少切口长度却不能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号